HOL Guard vs Rayrun
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | HOL Guard | |
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Runtime security layer that stops risky AI actions before they execute | One endpoint for every MCP tool |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | US |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free plan: Local Guard runtime with real-time approval prompts and local audit log. Solo $4.99/mo: adds 2 cloud-connected devices and 30-day cloud retention. Pro $15/mo: adds 5 cloud-connected devices, 180-day retention, and policy versioning. Team $30/seat/mo: up to 25 cloud-connected devices, 365- | Free for one developer with up to 25 source-built services, 50,000 tool calls a month, then $0.20 per thousand. Team plan is $25 per developer per month with 100,000 tool calls per developer a month, pooled, then $0.20 per thousand. Enterprise from $1,500 per month. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 53 +1 (up) since last check | 45 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 27 | 12 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 44 | 36 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 735 | 125 |
5 details filled in for both companies.