Haste Health vs Zipline

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Haste Health compared with Zipline
Detail	Haste Health	Zipline
What it does	Open-source FHIR server for AI-native health apps	One thread for every AI assistant you use
Stage	Not given	MVP
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	IE
Pricing model	Freemium	Free trial
Pricing	Self-hosted: Free under Apache-2.0. Developer tier: $0/month (free hosted tenant, no credit card). Production: $1,500/month (signed BAA, 10,000,000 API points/day, 99.9% uptime SLA). Scale: From $6,000/month (50,000,000 API points/day, 99.95% uptime SLA).	Not given
Key features	FHIR R4 REST API with full CRUD operations OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect authentication Model Context Protocol endpoints for AI agents Attribute-based access control with FHIRPath SQL on FHIR analytics views Custom operations in TypeScript Multi-tenant support TOTP MFA and hardened authentication SDKs for TypeScript, Rust and React	TypeScript SDK MCP server integration
What makes it different	Normalizes data from Epic, Oracle Health, HL7v2 and any FHIR server into one API No feature gates: same open-source code in self-hosted and hosted versions Production-ready compliance: signed BAA, SOC 2 roadmap, pre-answered security questionnaire	Single conversation thread across multiple AI assistants Works in native AI assistant apps without switching Uses open standard MCP for integrations Automatic task pickup for Claude and Grok Full user control with pause and revoke options
Free plan	Not given	Not given
Open source	Not given	Not given
Platforms	Not given	Not given
Public API	Not given	Not given
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	2 no change since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	3	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	22	15
Referring domains (Majestic)	13	3

4 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Haste Health More alternatives to Zipline