Harny vs AON
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Harny compared with AON
| Detail | 
Harny | 
AON |
|---|
| What it does | Agent harness infrastructure that gives AI agents memory for each user, connected accounts, action limits and an audit record.
| Structured offer network for AI-native commerce connecting AI products with merchant offers and preserving attribution
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | CA
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free: first 500 monthly-active end users per month, free forever. Paid: $0.30 per monthly-active end user above 500, billed monthly.
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Timestamped memory ingestion with backdating capability
- Per-user data isolation and privacy scoping
- Ranked memory recall with dated evidence
- Connected accounts integration per user
- Long-running agent jobs with folder-level operations
- Configurable token ceiling per API call
- Enforced action limits on agent operations
- Complete action audit trail with hash chaining
- MCP server integration for Claude and other clients
| - Capture user intent signals
- Match intent to ranked merchant offers
- Native offer rendering
- Qualified outcome tracking
- Multiple presentation surfaces
- TypeScript SDK integration
- REST API for any language
- Real-time performance reporting
- Full design control with custom components
- MCP access for compatible hosts
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Highest published BEAM benchmark score at 128K tokens: 85.1, compared to competing memory systems
- 98% fewer tokens required than raw tool output, making responses 4× cheaper
- Works with 20+ agent frameworks including LangChain, LangGraph and LlamaIndex
- First 500 monthly-active end users free forever
- Per-person billing model scales with user growth, not API calls
| - No injected iframes or third-party scripts
- Minimal integration required
- Intent-matched offers vs fixed ad placements
- Dynamic offer matching for AI workflows
- No minimum traffic requirements
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet ● no change since last check | 14 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 7 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 29 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 1 | 35 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Harny More alternatives to AON