Skip to main content
NexoraLaunch home

Build log live

Groq vs condense

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Groq compared with condense
Detail Groqcondense logo condense
What it doesPremier neocloud for fast inference Cut your AI agent bill
StageEstablished Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inUS LT
Pricing modelNot given Freemium
PricingNot given Proxy API: 15% of savings on provider bill. Models API: $0.40 per 1M tokens removed (Helene 1.1), $0.90 per 1M tokens removed (Adeline 1). Free tier available with Condense Lite (approximately 20% compression).
Key features
  • GroqMetal: dedicated bare-metal infrastructure tuned for speed and reliability
  • GroqCore: production-ready inference stack with no infrastructure expertise required
  • GroqAssured: enterprise-grade governance, auditability, and control
  • 256 LPUs per rack with 40 PB/s SRAM bandwidth
  • 1,000 tokens per second per user throughput
  • 128 GB on-chip SRAM per rack
  • 315 PFLOPS of FP8 inference compute
  • 13 globally distributed data centers across four continents
  • Proxy API for seamless integration requiring only one base URL and header change
  • Maintains 98.6% cache hit rate
  • Preserves instructions, questions, answers, code and error messages
  • Direct billing from provider with no stored API keys
  • SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 compliance in progress
  • Zero data retention with GDPR export and erasure support
What makes it different
  • Fast inference at scale without sacrificing affordability
  • LPU pioneered technology integrated with NVIDIA GPUs
  • Fully integrated platform combining infrastructure, inference, and control
  • Removes 37.3% of bills on average sessions and 66-72% on sessions over 800k tokens
  • Pay only 15% of savings on Proxy API with no fee if no savings occur
  • Built around cache architecture rather than against it
  • Public benchmark allowing comparison with alternatives before purchase
  • Operates transparently with audit logs and ability to inspect rewritten requests
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)86 +1 (up) since last check12 +2 (up) since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)377
Citation Flow (Majestic)5617
Referring domains (Majestic)1255212

4 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Groq More alternatives to condense

Ask a question