GoodMem vs Cogni
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
GoodMem compared with Cogni
| Detail | 
GoodMem | C
Cogni |
|---|
| What it does | Memory layer for AI agents that saves tokens, improves itself, and enforces access control
| Memory that reasons
|
|---|
| Stage | Startup
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | 2024
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | US
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Self-hosted: Free for commercial use. GoodMem Cloud: From $15/mo with usage-based pricing, 14-day free trial. Enterprise: Custom pricing.
| Free plan at $0 USD; Pro plan at $5 USD per month.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Automated retrieval stack optimization
- Multimodal document processing with page images
- Granular access control and permissions
- Hybrid search with dense and sparse embedders
- Support for multiple LLM providers
- Multi-language SDKs and APIs
- Flexible deployment options
- ISO/IEC 27001 certified security
- SLSA Build L3 provenance
| - Entity-graph spreading activation for cross-vocabulary retrieval
- Works with any LLM model
- No LLM or GPU in retrieval path
- Point-in-time and windowed recall
- Timestamped memories
- Fixed recall cost as memory grows
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Achieves frontier model quality at 1/35 of the cost using small self-hosted models
- Automatically optimizes retrieval stack for your data on real queries
- Never locks you in with proprietary storage
- Runs on-premises with full data control
| - Reaches answers across unrelated documents that share no keywords, where vector search scores zero
- Deterministic retrieval with no model in the path, so results never vary between queries
- Constant per-query cost regardless of memory size, even at 32,000 words
- No infrastructure to run—no vector database, cluster, or GPU needed
- Works with any model, so small local models gain the most from better retrieval
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 44 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | 4 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 10 | 2 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 32 | 21 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 70 | 34 |
|---|
6 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to GoodMem More alternatives to Cogni