Ficelle vs EvoLink
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | OpenAI-compatible router that puts free LLM models from 13 providers behind one endpoint with automatic failover | One API to access 170+ AI models for production apps, agents, and workflows |
| Stage | Not given | Startup |
| Founded | Not given | 2025 |
| Based in | FR | HK |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Not given |
| Pricing | Free: open core under BSL 1.1, no account or card required. Pro: 12 € monthly (or 9.08 € per month billed annually at 109 €/yr), or 199 € for Lifetime license (one payment, no renewals, limited to first 200). 14-day free trial for Pro requires a card. | Pay-as-you-go with credits starting at $10 minimum top-up. Video and audio billed per second, images per image, LLMs per token. Credits never expire. Examples: Seedance 2.5 from $0.084 per input + output second, Sora 2 from $0.085 per output second, Claude Opus 5.5 pricing available per model. No su |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet no change since last check | 63 +1 (up) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 10 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 12 | 44 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 1 | 1251 |
5 details filled in for both companies.