EvoLink vs UberLLM

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

EvoLink compared with UberLLM
Detail	EvoLink	UberLLM
What it does	One API to access 170+ AI models for production apps, agents, and workflows	One API key for AI models, usually below list price
Stage	Startup	Not given
Founded	2025	Not given
Based in	HK	US
Pricing model	Not given	Freemium
Pricing	Pay-as-you-go with credits starting at $10 minimum top-up. Video and audio billed per second, images per image, LLMs per token. Credits never expire. Examples: Seedance 2.5 from $0.084 per input + output second, Sora 2 from $0.085 per output second, Claude Opus 5.5 pricing available per model. No su	Free account with pay-as-you-go pricing starting from $5 credit. No monthly fee. Card payments cost 5.5% + $0.50. Individual model prices vary: Claude Opus 5.5 from $0.10 per 1M input tokens to $0.50 per 1M output tokens; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash from $0.000179 to $0.0014 per 1M tokens; GPT-6 Luna from $
Key features	Access to 170+ models from 30+ providers including GPT, Claude, Gemini, Seedance, Kling, Suno Intelligent routing for fastest and most cost-efficient endpoint Compatible with OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google SDKs Production-ready async APIs with webhooks and callbacks Minimal latency routing overhead under 50ms Secure proxy with no prompt storage and TLS 1.3 encryption Single API key across all 170+ models and providers	One API key for every major model Routes requests to cheapest healthy seller Text, image, video and music models $0 billing for failed requests OpenAI and Anthropic SDK compatible No monthly fee or minimum spend Pay-as-you-go billing from $5 credit Credit does not expire Stream, poll or webhook support
What makes it different	Unified access to 170+ models from 30+ providers through single API Automatic failover and intelligent routing for guaranteed reliability Production-focused infrastructure with clear docs and real async support	Zero-risk billing: never pay for failed requests
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	63 +1 (up) since last check	5 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	10	3
Citation Flow (Majestic)	44	28
Referring domains (Majestic)	1251	22

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to EvoLink More alternatives to UberLLM