ekstrakt vs SciFig
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
ekstrakt compared with SciFig
| Detail | 
ekstrakt | 
SciFig |
|---|
| What it does | Transform any YouTube video into concise, actionable insights
| AI scientific figure generator for illustrations, charts and flowcharts
|
|---|
| Stage | Startup
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| GB
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free plan with 5 summaries; Monthly Plan at $6 USD; Yearly Plan at $60 USD
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Multiple summary depths (Short, Detailed, Straight to Answer, Ask a Question)
- Timestamped transcripts
- Support for 22 languages
- Question and answer functionality
- Chrome extension integration
- Dark mode support
| - Sketch-to-Figure: convert hand-drawn sketches into editable scientific illustrations
- Reference-to-Figure: create illustrations from reference images and papers
- PDF-to-Figure and Photo-to-Figure input modes
- DataChart: 50 chart types plotted from CSV and Excel data
- FlowChart: editable diagrams for PRISMA, CONSORT, model architectures and workflows
- Export as editable PPTX, layered SVG and 8K PNG/JPG
- Region redraw and AI editing without regenerating entire figure
- Vector Canvas: edit any figure as layered, editable SVG
- Publication license certificate for each figure with QR verification
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No extra cost to switch between summary types on the same video
- Saves hours of watching time with instant summaries
- Clickable transcripts with exact timestamps
- Works directly on YouTube without tab switching
| - Every figure stays editable after generation, not flat raster output like general image generators
- One credit buys creation and editing across all three workspaces: Illustration, DataChart and FlowChart
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 32 ● no change since last check | 48 ▲ +1 (up) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 9 | 11 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 34 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 102 | 301 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to ekstrakt More alternatives to SciFig