ekstrakt vs LitFigure

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

ekstrakt compared with LitFigure
Detail	ekstrakt	LitFigure
What it does	Transform any YouTube video into concise, actionable insights	AI scientific figure studio for biomedical researchers
Stage	Startup	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	Not given
Pricing model	Freemium	Freemium
Pricing	Free plan with 5 summaries; Monthly Plan at $6 USD; Yearly Plan at $60 USD	Free: 3 credits (no card required). Starter Pack: $9.90 one-time for 100 credits (valid 30 days). Monthly subscriptions: Starter $25/month (100 credits), Researcher $49/month (220 credits), Pro $99/month (500 credits). Standard generation or revision costs 1 credit; high quality costs 2 credits.
Key features	Multiple summary depths (Short, Detailed, Straight to Answer, Ask a Question) Timestamped transcripts Support for 22 languages Question and answer functionality Chrome extension integration Dark mode support	Generate figures from text descriptions of mechanisms, workflows and experiments Revise figures with plain language prompts Canvas editing for supported document types Export PNG, SVG and PPTX formats Versioned revisions with rollback capability Three figure types: mechanism diagrams, experimental workflows and graphical abstracts Free canvas edits and exports Credit-based system for AI generations and revisions
What makes it different	No extra cost to switch between summary types on the same video Saves hours of watching time with instant summaries Clickable transcripts with exact timestamps Works directly on YouTube without tab switching	Specialized for biomedical research with built-in templates and examples All revisions are versioned and reversible Document-dependent export editability with canvas object support Transparent about limitations: requires human review before submission
Free plan	Not given	Not given
Open source	Not given	Not given
Platforms	Not given	Not given
Public API	Not given	Not given
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	32 no change since last check	4 −1 (down) since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	9	1
Citation Flow (Majestic)	21	20
Referring domains (Majestic)	102	9

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to ekstrakt More alternatives to LitFigure