ekstrakt vs Image26
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
ekstrakt compared with Image26
| Detail | 
ekstrakt | 
Image26 |
|---|
| What it does | Transform any YouTube video into concise, actionable insights
| AI image generator and photo editor powered by GPT Image 2.6
|
|---|
| Stage | Startup
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free plan with 5 summaries; Monthly Plan at $6 USD; Yearly Plan at $60 USD
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Multiple summary depths (Short, Detailed, Straight to Answer, Ask a Question)
- Timestamped transcripts
- Support for 22 languages
- Question and answer functionality
- Chrome extension integration
- Dark mode support
| - Generate images up to 4K resolution
- Create looping GIFs and SVG graphics
- Text rendering with correct spelling and legible headlines
- Circle-to-edit markup for precise photo edits
- Fast and Thinking generation modes
- Multiple reference images for try-ons and style consistency
- Multilingual prompt support
- Commercial use rights included in paid plans
- Support for both GPT Image 2.6 and GPT Image 2.5 models
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No extra cost to switch between summary types on the same video
- Saves hours of watching time with instant summaries
- Clickable transcripts with exact timestamps
- Works directly on YouTube without tab switching
| - Layout planning: GPT Image 2.6 plans the layout before drawing, ensuring headlines and labels land exactly where requested
- Speed: up to 50% faster than GPT Image 2.5 with the Fast mode
- Both Fast and Thinking modes cost the same, allowing flexible quality choices without price changes
- GIFs and SVGs from prompts alone: looping animations and scalable graphics without separate tools
- Precise editing with circle-to-edit markup for controlled photo adjustments
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 32 ● no change since last check | 1 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 9 | 7 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 20 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 102 | 16 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to ekstrakt More alternatives to Image26