ekstrakt vs Fish Voice
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
ekstrakt compared with Fish Voice
| Detail | 
ekstrakt | 
Fish Voice |
|---|
| What it does | Transform any YouTube video into concise, actionable insights
| AI voice generator for text to speech, voice cloning, and voice design
|
|---|
| Stage | Startup
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free plan with 5 summaries; Monthly Plan at $6 USD; Yearly Plan at $60 USD
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Multiple summary depths (Short, Detailed, Straight to Answer, Ask a Question)
- Timestamped transcripts
- Support for 22 languages
- Question and answer functionality
- Chrome extension integration
- Dark mode support
| - 300+ public voices across 6 language groups
- Editable text-to-speech with preview before rendering
- Permission-based voice cloning from authorized recordings
- Prompt-driven voice design to create synthetic speakers
- Generation history and reusable voice models
- Support for English, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Spanish, and Portuguese
- Maximum 1,000 characters per conversion
- 24/7 browser-based access without studio booking
- Downloadable audio in multiple formats
- Revision workflow keeping scripts editable during production
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No extra cost to switch between summary types on the same video
- Saves hours of watching time with instant summaries
- Clickable transcripts with exact timestamps
- Works directly on YouTube without tab switching
| - Permission-based voice cloning with consent verification built into the workflow
- Edit and revise text within the same workflow without new recording sessions
- Account-based browser workspace combining discovery, generation, and export
- Independent service separate from Fish Audio
- Human-in-the-loop review for accuracy and suitability
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 32 ● no change since last check | 14 ▼ −1 (down) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 9 | 21 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 29 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 102 | 51 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to ekstrakt More alternatives to Fish Voice