ekstrakt vs Fig0
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
ekstrakt compared with Fig0
| Detail | 
ekstrakt | 
Fig0 |
|---|
| What it does | Transform any YouTube video into concise, actionable insights
| AI Scientific Figure Generator for researchers and scientists
|
|---|
| Stage | Startup
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free plan with 5 summaries; Monthly Plan at $6 USD; Yearly Plan at $60 USD
| Free plan with 200 credits valid 60 days; Starter $9.90/month ($4.90/month annual, $0.0016/credit); Standard $19.90/month ($9.90/month annual, $0.0012/credit); Premium $39.90/month ($19.90/month annual, $0.0011/credit)
|
|---|
| Key features | - Multiple summary depths (Short, Detailed, Straight to Answer, Ask a Question)
- Timestamped transcripts
- Support for 22 languages
- Question and answer functionality
- Chrome extension integration
- Dark mode support
| - Text-to-Figure generation from descriptions
- Sketch and reference inputs with layout preservation
- Infinite canvas for refinement and arrangement
- Editable vector export in SVG, PPTX, PDF
- High-resolution output with 300/600 DPI TIFF
- Editable text labels and region refinement
- Background cleanup and upscaling
- PDF, photo and existing figure as input
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No extra cost to switch between summary types on the same video
- Saves hours of watching time with instant summaries
- Clickable transcripts with exact timestamps
- Works directly on YouTube without tab switching
| - Preserves editability after AI generation for team collaboration
- Multiple input modes including text, sketch, photo and PDF
- Export in publication submission formats without leaving the tool
- Handles reviewer changes and last-mile figure polish
- Designed specifically for scientific workflows, not generic image tools
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 32 ● no change since last check | 30 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 9 | 7 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 16 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 102 | 85 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to ekstrakt More alternatives to Fig0