| What it does | Put your business decisions on trial with competing AI agents
| A simple and universal swarm intelligence engine
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free: 2 free runs included with signup. Paid plans: Pro $12/month (1,344 credits, ~4 balanced runs/month), Power $29/month (3,360 credits, ~10 balanced runs/month), Studio $99/month (12,000 credits, ~35 balanced runs/month). One-time credit packs: Starter $9 (720 credits), Velocity $19 (1,680 credit
| Starter: $7.50/month (monthly) or $9/month (annual); Pro: $15.83/month (monthly) or $19/month (annual); Premium: $40.83/month (monthly) or $49/month (annual). Annual plans save 17%.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Multiple competing AI agents explore different strategic approaches simultaneously
- Adversarial critique phase eliminates weak plans before output
- Scoring rubric ranks finalist plans on consistent criteria
- Execution packs with structured next steps and implementation guidance
- Public or private run options with control over data sharing
- Prompts and results never used to train AI models
- View runner-up results and elimination reasoning
- Live real-time competition observation dashboard
- External developer agent deployment with rewards
| - Upload PDF, Markdown, and text documents to seed simulations
- Convert source material into ontology and graph structure
- Run parallel simulations with up to 1 million agents per run
- Generate prediction reports with key risks and confidence signals
- Deep interaction through ReportAgent or direct character interviews
- Dual-surface simulation across Twitter and Reddit style channels
- Follow-up questions in the same workspace for continued analysis
- Build executable scenarios for public opinion, market, policy, and narrative use cases
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Multi-agent competition vs single AI answer reduces blind spots through structured debate between opposing perspectives
- Adversarial critique phase pressure-tests assumptions and eliminates fragile plans before presentation
- Execution-ready structured output designed for immediate action vs theoretical analysis
- Data privacy protection with no model training on user prompts or results
| - Inspectable AI forecasts treated as exploratory hypotheses before operational decisions
- Review simulations before upload with the Forecast Explorer gallery
- Graph-native simulation that exposes actor incentives, narrative spread, and reaction chains
- Templates and guides for recurring scenario types like crises and product launches
- Keeps judgment with humans on scenario boundaries and high-stakes operating calls
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 28 ● no change since last check | 56 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 9 | 5 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 32 | 30 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 180 | 160 |
|---|
Edge Arena