Cogni vs WBX Sandbox
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Cogni compared with WBX Sandbox
| Detail | C
Cogni | WS
WBX Sandbox |
|---|
| What it does | Memory that reasons
| Secure execution for AI agents in isolated Firecracker microVMs or WebAssembly
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | US
| CZ
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free plan at $0 USD; Pro plan at $5 USD per month.
| Free plan: no card required, 5 concurrent sandboxes, up to 1 hour per sandbox, one-time welcome credit. Pro: $49.00/month (excl. VAT) with $25.00 usage credit, 25 concurrent sandboxes, up to 24 hours per sandbox, 100 vCPU/100 GB RAM total. Team: $119.00/month (excl. VAT) with $50.00 usage credit, 10
|
|---|
| Key features | - Entity-graph spreading activation for cross-vocabulary retrieval
- Works with any LLM model
- No LLM or GPU in retrieval path
- Point-in-time and windowed recall
- Timestamped memories
- Fixed recall cost as memory grows
| - Isolated Firecracker microVMs with own kernel and filesystem
- Background jobs that survive disconnects
- Batch execution with up to 1,000 jobs and dependency passing
- WebAssembly jobs starting in milliseconds without VM boot
- Budget Guard with cost reserves and limits
- Execution receipts with runtime, isolation, resources and file hashes
- Native MCP server integration for ChatGPT and Claude
- Compact log digests instead of full 5,000-line logs
- Server-side job waiting with signed webhooks
- Verified package cache for PyPI, npm, Go and Rust
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Reaches answers across unrelated documents that share no keywords, where vector search scores zero
- Deterministic retrieval with no model in the path, so results never vary between queries
- Constant per-query cost regardless of memory size, even at 32,000 words
- No infrastructure to run—no vector database, cluster, or GPU needed
- Works with any model, so small local models gain the most from better retrieval
| - Two runtimes with honest isolation labeling
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 4 ● no change since last check | 2 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 2 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 0 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 34 | 0 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Cogni More alternatives to WBX Sandbox