Cogni vs Perseus Computing
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Cogni compared with Perseus Computing
| Detail | C
Cogni |
Perseus Computing |
| What it does | Memory that reasons
| High-assurance infrastructure for AI agents
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | US
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Open source
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free plan at $0 USD; Pro plan at $5 USD per month.
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Entity-graph spreading activation for cross-vocabulary retrieval
- Works with any LLM model
- No LLM or GPU in retrieval path
- Point-in-time and windowed recall
- Timestamped memories
- Fixed recall cost as memory grows
| - Harpe: chooses what an AI agent reads under a token budget with consistent results
- Kibisis: keeps agent memory on your hardware with AES-256-GCM encryption
- Argus: append-only record that detects edits with cryptographic verification
- No network code by default for local and disconnected use
- MIT License with published code, benchmarks and raw results
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Reaches answers across unrelated documents that share no keywords, where vector search scores zero
- Deterministic retrieval with no model in the path, so results never vary between queries
- Constant per-query cost regardless of memory size, even at 32,000 words
- No infrastructure to run—no vector database, cluster, or GPU needed
- Works with any model, so small local models gain the most from better retrieval
| - Measured empirical validation across 6,111 questions outperforming full-context models
- Zero plaintext on disk with encrypted vaults matching plaintext accuracy
- 78.3% fewer tokens sent to the model with a 1,200-token budget per turn
- Preserves conversational chronology and relational qualifiers under token budgets
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 4 ● no change since last check | 42 ▲ +1 (up) since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 2 | 3 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 24 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 34 | 62 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Cogni More alternatives to Perseus Computing