Cogni vs Mlola
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Cogni compared with Mlola
| Detail | C
Cogni | 
Mlola |
|---|
| What it does | Memory that reasons
| Reliable browser use with a fast path: deterministic mechanics, safety and verification, and a model asked only for judgement.
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | US
| ID
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free plan at $0 USD; Pro plan at $5 USD per month.
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Entity-graph spreading activation for cross-vocabulary retrieval
- Works with any LLM model
- No LLM or GPU in retrieval path
- Point-in-time and windowed recall
- Timestamped memories
- Fixed recall cost as memory grows
| - Observe page state in atomic passes without screenshots
- Model picks operations only from compatible targets
- Risk classification for payments, deletions, sends and secrets
- Typed actions with freshness, visibility and occlusion checks
- Append-only event log for replay and audit
- Chrome automation through Playwright
- Browser extension for agent isolation
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Reaches answers across unrelated documents that share no keywords, where vector search scores zero
- Deterministic retrieval with no model in the path, so results never vary between queries
- Constant per-query cost regardless of memory size, even at 32,000 words
- No infrastructure to run—no vector database, cluster, or GPU needed
- Works with any model, so small local models gain the most from better retrieval
| - Deterministic browser mechanics as default, models only for judgement and writing
- Safety enforced through code boundaries, not prompt requests
- Every step verified independently before proceeding
- Cost measured by fast-path share on every run
- Capabilities advertised honestly, imitation refused
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 4 ● no change since last check | 10 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 2 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 27 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 34 | 28 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Cogni More alternatives to Mlola