Cogni vs Lusor
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Cogni compared with Lusor
| Detail | C
Cogni | 
Lusor |
|---|
| What it does | Memory that reasons
| Run AI agents on real phones or control phones directly via API
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | US
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free plan at $0 USD; Pro plan at $5 USD per month.
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Entity-graph spreading activation for cross-vocabulary retrieval
- Works with any LLM model
- No LLM or GPU in retrieval path
- Point-in-time and windowed recall
- Timestamped memories
- Fixed recall cost as memory grows
| - Send AI agents tasks in plain language to execute on phones
- Direct phone control with tap, type, swipe and app launch actions
- Support for iPhone, Android and cloud-based Lusor Phones
- Screen reading capability
- API with interactive playground
- Agent sessions and turn-based interaction
- Recordings and replay functionality
- Location and timezone control for phones
- Structured output from agent tasks
- Multi-model support for agents
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Reaches answers across unrelated documents that share no keywords, where vector search scores zero
- Deterministic retrieval with no model in the path, so results never vary between queries
- Constant per-query cost regardless of memory size, even at 32,000 words
- No infrastructure to run—no vector database, cluster, or GPU needed
- Works with any model, so small local models gain the most from better retrieval
| - Provides real phones to AI agents for authentic task execution
- Supports both your own phones and managed cloud phones
- Complete screen interaction capabilities for automation
- Developer-focused with versioned API and JSON responses
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 4 ● no change since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 2 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 0 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 34 | 0 |
|---|
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Cogni More alternatives to Lusor