Cogni vs iLang Inc.
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Cogni compared with iLang Inc.
| Detail | C
Cogni | 
iLang Inc. |
|---|
| What it does | Memory that reasons
| The native language of AI; in human terms, a protocol.
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Startup
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| 2026
|
|---|
| Based in | US
| CA
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Open source
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free plan at $0 USD; Pro plan at $5 USD per month.
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Entity-graph spreading activation for cross-vocabulary retrieval
- Works with any LLM model
- No LLM or GPU in retrieval path
- Point-in-time and windowed recall
- Timestamped memories
- Fixed recall cost as memory grows
| - AI-native communication protocol with 88 verbs and two syntaxes
- AI See: give any AI model vision by pasting i.ilang.ai URLs
- Zero installation required, pure text format
- Works across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Qwen and other models
- Loader available via pip and npm for automatic protocol injection
- Prompt compression: 67% reduction in tokens for typical instructions
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Reaches answers across unrelated documents that share no keywords, where vector search scores zero
- Deterministic retrieval with no model in the path, so results never vary between queries
- Constant per-query cost regardless of memory size, even at 32,000 words
- No infrastructure to run—no vector database, cluster, or GPU needed
- Works with any model, so small local models gain the most from better retrieval
| - First protocol to formally map Greek mathematical symbols as primitive verbs for AI-to-AI communication
- Computable vector space for AI judgment using 11 dimensions and fuzzy mathematics instead of binary classification
- Open source and MIT licensed with no royalties or approval required
- Operates at the instruction and behavioral layer, complementary to MCP and A2A protocols
- Tested and benchmarked with public conformance results and DOI-registered research
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 4 ● no change since last check | 38 ▲ +1 (up) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 2 | 7 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 27 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 34 | 66 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Cogni More alternatives to iLang Inc.