Cogni vs Dyadic Terminal
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Cogni compared with Dyadic Terminal
| Detail | C
Cogni | 
Dyadic Terminal |
|---|
| What it does | Memory that reasons
| Talk to Iris, inspect work and files, and explore local data in a terminal.
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | US
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free plan at $0 USD; Pro plan at $5 USD per month.
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Entity-graph spreading activation for cross-vocabulary retrieval
- Works with any LLM model
- No LLM or GPU in retrieval path
- Point-in-time and windowed recall
- Timestamped memories
- Fixed recall cost as memory grows
| - Chat with Iris AI assistant
- File inspection and management
- Local data exploration
- MCP integration
- Multi-theme support
- Configuration management
- Passkey-based authentication
- Multiple device support
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Reaches answers across unrelated documents that share no keywords, where vector search scores zero
- Deterministic retrieval with no model in the path, so results never vary between queries
- Constant per-query cost regardless of memory size, even at 32,000 words
- No infrastructure to run—no vector database, cluster, or GPU needed
- Works with any model, so small local models gain the most from better retrieval
| - Runs natively on Windows and Linux without requiring Bun installation
- Supports multiple installation methods including npm, pip, PowerShell, and shell scripts
- Integrates with OpenAI-compatible and Anthropic-compatible APIs
- Manages skills, plugins and MCP extensions without requiring package rebuilds
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 4 ● no change since last check | 1 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 2 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 4 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 34 | 1 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Cogni More alternatives to Dyadic Terminal