Busabase vs ForAgent
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Busabase compared with ForAgent
| Detail | 
Busabase | 
ForAgent |
|---|
| What it does | The open-source database and workspace for AI agents
| Private numbers for AI agents
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| MVP
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free: $0 (1 space, 3 seats, 5,000 records, 1 GB storage). Plus: $10/seat/month ($120/year, 2 months free) for 3 spaces, 10 seats, 20 GB storage. Pro: $20/seat/month ($240/year, 2 months free) for unlimited spaces, unlimited seats, 100 GB storage.
| Free: $0/month with 30 calls per month, 3 app numbers + 2 remote numbers. Pro: $9.99/month with 100 calls per month. Scale: $29.99/month with unlimited calls.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Open source MIT license - run locally, self-host on server, or use cloud
- Support for multiple agents via REST API, MCP, Agent Skills, and OpenAPI
- Human review and approval workflow for agent changes
- Structured data tables with fixed columns for agents and people to share
- Docs and knowledge base with verified sources
- Reusable agent skills and playbooks
- Apps and views built on shared data structures
- Role-based permissions and access controls
- Offline support on desktop with no usage tracking
| - Private phone numbers for agents
- Call approval system
- App and plugin integration
- Call recording and transcription
- Cross-device agent connections
- Number blocking and removal
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Only AI agent workspace that keeps complete history and requires human approval before changes enter canonical data
- Unified workspace where agents and people access the same data, avoiding scattered chat logs
- Completely self-hosted and private on your own hardware with full control over data
- Works with any agent that calls REST API - no lock-in to specific model or platform
- Rejects never enter canonical data - all decisions remain attached for auditability
| - First-call approval for security
- Simple user-controlled access management
- Data never used for training models
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 17 ▼ −1 (down) since last check | 11 ▲ +4 (up) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 6 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 32 | 11 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 143 | 1 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Busabase More alternatives to ForAgent