AT0M vs Recurse
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
AT0M compared with Recurse
| Detail | AT0M | Recurse |
|---|
| What it does | A private System One Decision AI that runs locally
| Build and deploy Agent MCP Apps
|
|---|
| Stage | Beta
| Growing
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| usage-based
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Non-autoregressive with no free text generation
- Multi-question call support in a single forward pass
- Bounded output within supplied candidate set
- Calibrated probabilities without temperature fitting
- Local inference as a Rust binary executable
- Deterministic inference with reproducible results
- Support for choice, score, and yes-no decision types
- CPU, Apple Metal, and CUDA hardware support
- Trainable on your own decisions locally
| - Run agents with Python tools
- Deploy agents as MCP servers
- Validate structured inputs and outputs
- Inspect run results and artifacts
- Secrets management
- 24-hour result retention
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Bounded output structurally prevents off-list answers, unlike generative models
- Calibration by construction without temperature fitting enables direct threshold-based automation
- Local executable keeps inference in your perimeter with no per-decision API dependency
- Cost structure based on electricity, not output tokens
- Deterministic inference with identical results across repeated requests
| - No subscription or idle charges for usage-based pricing
- Zero markup on model tokens
- Hosting included with deployment
- Available through MCP clients like Claude and Codex
- Full visibility into agent execution and results
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 22 ● no change since last check | 35 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 11 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 3 | 20 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 1 | 39 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to AT0M More alternatives to Recurse