Skip to main content
NexoraLaunch home

Build log live

Argentic vs GitMir

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Argentic compared with GitMir
DetailArgentic logo ArgenticGitMir logo GitMir
What it doesAn engine for long-running agents that rebuilds its prompt under a cap and runs on your budget AI model of your product's business logic accessible to people and AI agents
StageMVP Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given GB
Pricing modelFreemium Freemium
PricingPrototype: free during beta, then from December 16, 2026 it costs $1 per 1,000 agent calls after 1,000 monthly included calls. Production: $20 a month with 20,000 agent calls included, then $1 per 1,000 calls after that. Top-ups: $1 per 1,000 calls, from $10 to $500 at a time, never expiring. Free: 10,000 starting credits plus 1,000 per month. Engineering: $29 per active developer per month with 30,000 pooled credits each month. GitMir Vibe: $9 per person per month. Cloud Compute: $99 per project per month. MeetAI: $49 per project per month. GoBots: $99 per venture per month. Market: $49
Key features
  • Prompt rebuilt from journal under token cap at each step to keep it bounded as history grows
  • Spending limits checked before each model call at token prices you declare
  • Resume after crash without repeating finished actions
  • Tool calls returned as actions for your code to carry out
  • Proof of what ran: check prompts, re-run engine, download hash-chained journal
  • Integrations with Vercel AI SDK, OpenAI Agents SDK, LangGraph, Mastra, Pydantic AI
  • MCP server for Claude Code, Claude Projects and Codex
  • Works with any model via bring-your-own-key
  • TypeScript and Python clients for HTTP API access
  • Builds features, rules and customer paths and keeps them current with every push
  • Shows what each commit changed in the business logic, not only in the code
  • Provides change impact analysis before merge showing what could break
  • Checks PRDs and specifications against the product
  • Delivers understanding to AI agents over MCP
  • Runs locally on your machine with GMM Local
  • Finds risky patterns and problems in the product
  • Enterprise deployment inside your security boundary
  • Integrates with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and VS Code
  • MCP access for agents with 1-10 credits per answer
What makes it different
  • Bounded prompt under a fixed cap while history grows, so costs per call stop climbing on long sessions
  • Every run recorded with cryptographic proof: rebuilable prompts, hash-chained journal, re-runnable engine
  • Resumes from crash without repeating finished actions using stable idempotency keys
  • Budget enforcement before each model call, not reactive overage billing
  • No model key storage or logging; your provider bills you directly
  • Nearly 3× fewer errors on Benchmark 001 compared to alternatives
  • 8.4K tokens per question instead of 27.4K for competitors
  • Results published and measurable; method is proprietary
  • Reduces AI cost per completed agent action from $0.35 to $0.08
Free planNot given Not given
Open sourceNot given Not given
PlatformsNot given Not given
Public APINot given Not given
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)Not checked yet no change since last check27 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)03
Citation Flow (Majestic)928
Referring domains (Majestic)450

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Argentic More alternatives to GitMir

Ask a question