Apollo-1 vs iLang Inc.
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Apollo-1 compared with iLang Inc.
| Detail | 
Apollo-1 | 
iLang Inc. |
|---|
| What it does | Neuro-symbolic AI for enterprise agents that combine language understanding with symbolic logic in one integrated runtime
| The native language of AI; in human terms, a protocol.
|
|---|
| Stage | Established
| Startup
|
|---|
| Founded | 2017
| 2026
|
|---|
| Based in | US
| CA
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Contact for pricing
| Open source
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - One integrated runtime combining neural and symbolic systems
- Deterministic policy enforcement before action
- Complete execution trace for every turn
- Natural language program authoring with code generation
- Consistent decisions from identical inputs
- CPU-based logic execution with lightweight language models
- Managed service and custom enterprise deployment options
| - AI-native communication protocol with 88 verbs and two syntaxes
- AI See: give any AI model vision by pasting i.ilang.ai URLs
- Zero installation required, pure text format
- Works across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Qwen and other models
- Loader available via pip and npm for automatic protocol injection
- Prompt compression: 67% reduction in tokens for typical instructions
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Symbolic logic governs decisions instead of neural weights
- Lower operational costs through CPU-based logic and lightweight models
| - First protocol to formally map Greek mathematical symbols as primitive verbs for AI-to-AI communication
- Computable vector space for AI judgment using 11 dimensions and fuzzy mathematics instead of binary classification
- Open source and MIT licensed with no royalties or approval required
- Operates at the instruction and behavioral layer, complementary to MCP and A2A protocols
- Tested and benchmarked with public conformance results and DOI-registered research
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 20 ● no change since last check | 38 ▲ +1 (up) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 11 | 7 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 33 | 27 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 155 | 66 |
|---|
7 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Apollo-1 More alternatives to iLang Inc.