AI Security Guard vs WBX Sandbox
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
AI Security Guard compared with WBX Sandbox
| Detail | 
AI Security Guard | WS
WBX Sandbox |
|---|
| What it does | Research-backed education and tools for securing autonomous AI agents
| Secure execution for AI agents in isolated Firecracker microVMs or WebAssembly
|
|---|
| Stage | Startup
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | 2025
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | US
| CZ
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Paid
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Free plan: no card required, 5 concurrent sandboxes, up to 1 hour per sandbox, one-time welcome credit. Pro: $49.00/month (excl. VAT) with $25.00 usage credit, 25 concurrent sandboxes, up to 24 hours per sandbox, 100 vCPU/100 GB RAM total. Team: $119.00/month (excl. VAT) with $50.00 usage credit, 10
|
|---|
| Key features | - AgentGuard360 dashboard and Agent Proxy Tool Interface
- Supply chain protection blocking 11,000+ known malicious pip and npm packages
- 14-phase device hardening scans with predictive risk analytics
- Machine-learning-aided runtime scanning of agent content
- Jailbreak detection and prompt injection prevention
- Privacy-first architecture keeps data on device by default
- 500+ model pricing with budget tracking
- Protection SDK with single function call content scanning
- Learning Center with guides, how-tos, and CVE analysis
- Original research on agentic AI and LLM cost optimization
| - Isolated Firecracker microVMs with own kernel and filesystem
- Background jobs that survive disconnects
- Batch execution with up to 1,000 jobs and dependency passing
- WebAssembly jobs starting in milliseconds without VM boot
- Budget Guard with cost reserves and limits
- Execution receipts with runtime, isolation, resources and file hashes
- Native MCP server integration for ChatGPT and Claude
- Compact log digests instead of full 5,000-line logs
- Server-side job waiting with signed webhooks
- Verified package cache for PyPI, npm, Go and Rust
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No PhD in security required to protect AI agents
- Free resources and research with optional paid tools
- Secure agents and environments in five minutes
| - Two runtimes with honest isolation labeling
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 18 ● no change since last check | 2 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 2 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 27 | 0 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 86 | 0 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to AI Security Guard More alternatives to WBX Sandbox