Agentik vs Harny

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Agentik compared with Harny
Detail	Agentik	Harny
What it does	Connect your agent to 2,400+ tools through one MCP connection at provider prices	Agent harness infrastructure that gives AI agents memory for each user, connected accounts, action limits and an audit record.
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	FR	CA
Pricing model	Not given	Freemium
Pricing	Free tier with access to free tools and optional $5 promotional credit. Pay-as-you-go with no platform fee on first top-up of $10 or less; 5.5% platform fee (minimum $0.80) on larger first top-ups and subsequent top-ups. Tool calls charged at provider's price with 0% markup. Example prices: Google s	Free: first 500 monthly-active end users per month, free forever. Paid: $0.30 per monthly-active end user above 500, billed monthly.
Key features	Access to 2,436 tools from 52 providers Support for Claude, ChatGPT, Codex and Cursor Price preview before tool execution Per-call billing at provider prices with 0% markup Spending caps per hour, day, lifetime and per tool 113 playbooks for common tasks Tools across social media, ads, search and company data Single prepaid balance across all providers	Timestamped memory ingestion with backdating capability Per-user data isolation and privacy scoping Ranked memory recall with dated evidence Connected accounts integration per user Long-running agent jobs with folder-level operations Configurable token ceiling per API call Enforced action limits on agent operations Complete action audit trail with hash chaining MCP server integration for Claude and other clients
What makes it different	One prepaid balance eliminates need for separate accounts with 25+ providers 0% markup on all tool calls - pay provider prices directly Price transparency with cost shown before execution Granular spending controls per key, hour, day and tool Pre-built playbooks reduce setup time for common workflows	Highest published BEAM benchmark score at 128K tokens: 85.1, compared to competing memory systems 98% fewer tokens required than raw tool output, making responses 4× cheaper Works with 20+ agent frameworks including LangChain, LangGraph and LlamaIndex First 500 monthly-active end users free forever Per-person billing model scales with user growth, not API calls
Free plan	Not given	Not given
Open source	Not given	Not given
Platforms	Not given	Not given
Public API	Not given	Not given
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	37 −1 (down) since last check	Not checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	27	0
Citation Flow (Majestic)	33	0
Referring domains (Majestic)	55	1

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Agentik More alternatives to Harny