AgentBrush vs Linum
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
AgentBrush compared with Linum
| Detail | 
AgentBrush | 
Linum |
|---|
| What it does | Image generation built for coding agents
| Generative video models for animation
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | FR
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Starter: $9/month (100 tokens); Power: $29/month (1,000 tokens)
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Presets for multiple visual styles (realistic photos, flat illustrations, pixel art, isometric scenes, logos)
- Brand identity management with colors, fonts, and reference images
- Two-model pipeline with draft and refinement
- Mask editor for iterative inpainting
- Multi-CLI support (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and MCP-compatible agents)
- Token-based consumption tracking and usage dashboard
- Secure asset storage with signed CDN URLs
| - Pyramid-JiT (P-JiT) architecture with 32×32 token reduction
- 4× more aggressive token reduction than Linum v2
- Converges in 11× fewer samples than Linum v2
- 2B-parameter model with frozen Qwen text encoder
- Pixel-space diffusion with multi-resolution readouts
- PixelREPA alignment with DINOv3-L
- Curriculum learning over noise schedule
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Persistent visual taste for coding agents ensures every image matches brand automatically
- Five core primitives eliminate design decisions from the generation process
- Draft-and-refine pipeline delivers photorealistic quality at lower cost
- Works with any MCP-compatible coding agent with one subscription
| - Low-cost training: full 2B model trained for just $21K in compute
- Controls baked into model training rather than post-hoc fine-tuning
- Pixel-space compression without separate VAE bottleneck
- Apache 2.0 open release with full model weights and code
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 1 ● no change since last check | 44 ▲ +1 (up) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 4 | 5 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 30 | 32 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 87 | 397 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to AgentBrush More alternatives to Linum